|
|
|
Written by Jonathan Krohn
|
|
Tuesday, 28 April 2009 14:15 |
|
Congrats Sen. Spector! You have now saved yourself from being crushed by your own party, by switching to a new party. You have told yourself that it is more important for you to get everything you want and abandon that which you said you would stand for, instead of doing what is best for this nation and going back to your core principles. You are the one who helped fire the shot that created a festering wound in the American economy, a wound which some would call "economic stimulus." You Sen. Spector have left principle for power, you have left what you know is right behind and turned to that which is blatant opposing principle. I ask you Senator, what have you gained? Respect? No. Love from your constituents? No. A country that is firmly behind you? No, all you have gained is money and election support via the Democrat Party. For many in this nation, you have become an appalling example of Washington "politics-as-usual" and today you proved that you want to keep it that way. Now the time has come, America, for us as AMERICANS to stand on principle. Let us show those who have said they stand for something, yet only stand for themselves, that we CARE! 2010 is our opportunity to do this. If we can defeat typical politicians like Arlen Spector, and if we can defeat Liberals who do not stand for what we stand for as Americans, we will show our government what we stand for and what we believe. 2010 is our turn to tell Washington what we believe, what we will stand for and what we will absolutely NOT tolerate. Arlen Spector's party switch should not merely be a piece of distasteful political maneuvering to Americans, but also a rallying cry for Americans to stand for what is best for the nation. For this reason I am ardently supporting the defeat of Arlen Spector, and others of his ilk, that choose to put their own personal political gain before America itself. The civil action of the ballot has long been a method of the public showing what it wants done, and in 2010 we have that opportunity. |
|
|
Oops, A DEMOCRAT GETS IN TROUBLE! |
 |
 |
 |
|
Written by Jonathan Krohn
|
|
Monday, 27 April 2009 22:10 |
|
We hear day in and day out about the "evils" of the Republican party and the Conservative movement; in fact, we recently heard from the Department of Homeland Security that so-called "Right-Wing Extremism" is on the rise. However, I wonder how the left can explain this. Earlier today Democrat Representative James McGovern, along with four other Democrats, was ARRESTED outside the Sudanese Embassy for a second time. Why? Because he was practicing what he calls "civil disobedience" in protest to civil rights violations in Sudan. The Liberal legislator was escorted out of the area by police. (See the picture of the event here.) Hmmmm....What are we supposed to call Rep. McGovern a "peaceful demonstrator" a "civil rights advocate" or maybe a "community organizer?" Extreme? Nah, only us right wingers are extreme...Secretary Napolitano, what's the term of the day? |
|
|
Al Gore Slips up in a Climate Change Hearing! |
|
|
|
|
Written by Jonathan Krohn
|
|
Friday, 24 April 2009 20:18 |
|
Uh oh! Al Gore got caught red-handed! Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee asked him, after putting forth evidence, if he would benefit from climate change legislation in any way. She made no accusation of former VP Al Gore, instead she asked a simple question. More over, she said that it would be an opportunity for him to "clear the air" from such accusations. Instead of taking the opportunity to oblige Rep. Blackburn, and "clear the air" Albert Gore got defensive with her. "...if you believe that the reason I've been working on this issue for thirty years is because of greed, you don't know me." So said Al Gore in response to the Rep. Blackburn's question if he would "personally benefit from" the legislation that was being discussed by the committee. Why? If Al Gore had nothing to fear about, then why did he get defensive with her? Why did he bring up his "thirty years" of environmental work if it wasn't a big deal? Maybe Al Gore was not telling "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." Maybe the fact is that Al Gore is going to be benefitting from the climate change issue not only financially, like Rep. Blackburn discussed, but maybe even through another form...does the term "power" ring a bell? Maybe Al Gore is in it for more power over people. Maybe it isn't financial, but, after all of the countering scientific evidence, could it be possible that Al Gore is in it because he is gaining power over the hearts and minds of individuals across the country and even across the world? Maybe. Maybe Al Gore, knowing the political mess admitting something that unbecoming might sound, didn't want to admit this fault... On top of this, maybe Al Gore's defensive reaction is simply a reflection of the fact that Al Gore is benefitting from it financially. Al Gore's involvement with the group Kleiner Perkins, which Rep. Blackburn mentioned to Al Gore in this hearing, is a company in which he himself is a partner. Kleiner Perkins invested a government bailout-sized $1 BILLION (with a "b") in companies that would benefit from the legislation on climate change Al Gore was pushing today on Capitol Hill...Hmmmm...Would it not make sense that he would benefit from this? The facts say yes, but Al Gore, trying to cover himself from the shame of the people, says no. Who do you want to believe? Nice work Rep. Marsha Blackburn, you nailed him! |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 6 of 16 |
